In this discussion, you will apply the skills of argument identification and analysis to political discourse.
Part 1: In a Republican presidential debate, Senator Marco Rubio said, “For the life of me, I don’t know why we have stigmatized vocational training. Welders make more money than philosophers. We need more welders and less philosophers.” Examine Senator Rubio’s statement and write a short assessment of it. What are the argument’s premises (including hidden premises, if any) and conclusion? Is the argument deductive or inductive? Is it valid/invalid, strong/weak, sound/unsound, or cogent/uncogent?
- Stay on topic and make sure that you answer the questions that are asked (believe it or not this is the #1 mistake students make)
- Identify the premises, including any hidden (implied) premises and the conclusion (which also may not be explicitly stated)
- Reformat the argument so that it flows from the premises to the conclusion
- Next, identify if the argument is deductive or inductive use this article from the Start Here Module: Deductive vs Inductive Arguments
- Then, assess the truth of each premise
- If the argument is deductive discuss the validity of the argument, if the argument is inductive, discuss the strength of the argument
- If the argument is deductive discuss the soundness of the argument, if it is inductive discuss its cogency.
- Be careful not to mix deductive and inductive terminology
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
The post argument identification and analysis 1 appeared first on Top Premier Essays.
“#“”
