CASE INVESTIGATION REPORT “Serenity Valley”.
CASE INVESTIGATION REPORT “Serenity Valley”
Paper details Hi writer, In Week 2 a ‘real life’ ‘Serenity Valley’ case study scenario will be given” attached 12 parts”. This case study will be used in a logical flow as the basic model for the fraud investigation in all the modules covered in the unit. Your role as ‘Chief Investigator’ is to complete the case investigation report based on the findings of the Serenity Valley fraud investigation case study used in the unit. Consequently, gathering evidence for the report should be a continuing feature of your participation in the unit. A fraud examiner is responsible for writing clear, accurate and unbiased reports reflecting the fraud investigation and fraud examination results. The full details of the structure of the finished Case Investigation Report is available on the unit web page ” attached” but the structure of the case investigation report is briefly the following: • Cover Page • Table of Contents • Short introduction • Background (in final form, about 500 words) • Executive Summary (in final form, about 500 words) • Scope • Approach: Fraud Investigation Procedures (In final form, should be no more than 1400 words). • Summary (Should be no more than 40 words). • Impact (should be no more than 40 words). • Recommendations (final form, should be around 500 words). • Attachments • List of legislation/literature/interviews you’ve cited. Refer to the unit webpage for the full description of the expected structure (including word requirements) of the final case investigation report. Also refer to the final case investigation grading rubrics on the webpage “attached”. This Assessment Task relates to the following Learning Outcomes: 1. Demonstrate an understanding of the key legislation relating to fraud and cybercrime and the legal principles underpinning the definition of criminal behaviour. 2. Analyse the appropriate response and steps required to be taken by organisations, fraud examiners and individuals when an allegation of fraud arises. 3. Appreciate the composition of the investigation team, the rationale for the inclusion of each individual and the issues and challenges that need to be addressed to successfully manage a fraud investigation conducted by teams. 4. Apply a framework of logic and inference to secure digital or physical documentary evidence, identify relationships, prepare an investigative report, understand the role and nature of witness testimony and implement a cyber governance framework in an organisation.