Ideologies, Liberalism, Fascism, Anarchism.
Description -This paper should be between 1250 and 1500 words, and submitted double-spaced, in 12-point font, with each page numbered. -You are not expected to do any outside research or reading!!! , but you can cite arguments, ideas, and examples from lecture and optional, recommended readings. References to material from readings or lecture and any short direct quotations must be properly cited. All work, wording, and ideas that are not cited must be your own. You may choose any one of the following citation formats: APA, MLA, or either Chicago style, but please use it consistently. -Prompts and Structure Please choose one of the two prompts below. You should provide an introductory paragraph about your chosen topic, present a thesis statement, and then write several paragraphs providing examples and elaborating on these to support your thesis. You should then have one or two concluding paragraphs restating your argument and making a case for its significance. Prompt 1. Liberalism and anarchism both developed in part out of concerns about state tyranny, and each came to its own conclusions about what role the state should have in an ideal world. How and why are liberalism and anarchism’s views of the state similar or different? Which provides a more convincing case? Formulate an argument and support it using examples, from readings and lecture, of authors’ arguments and real-world cases. Prompt 2. Ideologies are designed to organize not only political life, but also social life, and so they offer different visions of how people live or how they should live. Liberalism and fascism see different roles for individuals in their ideal societies. What do each of them see as giving individuals meaning, and why do they take different stances on this issue? Choose one of these two ideologies and discuss the potential flaws or downsides in its ideal vision of individuals’ role in society. Formulate an argument and support it using examples, from readings and lecture, of authors’ arguments and real-world cases. -Thesis/Argument: Logical reasoning, supported claims, and critical thinking -Fully-formed, complete and wholly logical argument. Demonstrates clear understanding of course materials and prompt, but advances an original argument not directly discussed in course materials. -Analysis/synthesis: Examination and interpretation of class materials to compare and contrast ideologies and their principles or goals. -Key elements and arguments are identified and clarified in detail. Accurate, deep interpretation and justification using independent thought, building on course materials to present new and original interpretations and ideas. -Discussion: Development, depth, breadth and synthesis -Deep and copious evidence and/or comparative detail in supporting argument with clear, logical examples. Discussion fully developed with author’s opinion or interpretation in taking a stance of advocacy or criticism. Completely and fully accurate, extensive understanding of relevant course concepts. -Writing, organization, & structure: Clarity and accuracy of message; clear, logical structure and flow; grammatical or spelling errors do not obscure argument. -Proper citation of sources with formatted references (in-text citations/bibliography or footnotes. *Use Lecture Notes as reference (in the document below), and also the reading that I give you* DO NOT USE OUTSIDE SOURCES!!