Sociological Critique.
Write a short (1000-1300 word) critical review of one of the assigned readings. The review must concisely summarise the main argument and/or concept(s) developed by the author(s). The second part of the assignment requires students to evaluate critically the argument and concept(s) developed by the author(s) in their article or chapter. The third part of the assignment requires students to think about how the argument/concept(s) developed by the author(s) relates to some of the themes or debates explored in the course. Students need to refer to at least two (2) other required readings or additional readings in their critique (these additional readings can be found in the learning materials folder for each week) This is the reading to critique: https://www.sfu.ca/~andrewf/Latour_MissingMasses.pdf Article MUST be cited in ASA. This manual also has guidelines on how for format you in-text citations and bibliography using the American Sociological Association (ASA) guidelines. If you have any doubts or questions about ASA for in-text citations, please consult this source: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/using_research/formatting_in_sociology_asa_style/in_text_citation_references.html https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/using_research/formatting_in_sociology_asa_style/references_page_formatting.html The instructions state that I need to refer to two additional reading discussed in class. The instructions also state that we need to refer to concepts discussed in class. Some of these include: – ANT (actor network theory) and Scripts – SCOT (social construction of technological systerms) -Anti Cyclists – Technological determinsm (hard detereminism and soft determinism) – STS – Heterogenous engineering