CLC – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Intervention Presentation on Diabetes
- My Group
- Group Forum
This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.As a
group, identify a research or evidence-based article published within
the last 5 years that focuses comprehensively on a specific intervention
or new treatment tool for the management of diabetes in adults or
children. The article must be relevant to nursing practice.Create a 5
slide PowerPoint presentation on the study’s findings and how they can
be used by nurses as an intervention. Include speaker notes for each
slide and additional slides for the title page and references.
Digital Diabetes Management Application Improves Glycemic Outcomes in People With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabeteshttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1932296817747291
Provide a descriptive and reflective discussion of how the new tool or
intervention can be integrated into nursing practice. Provide evidence
to support your discussion.
You are required to cite to a minimum of two sources to complete this
assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and
appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing
practice.While APA style is not required for the body of this
assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of
sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can
be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success
Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to
beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for
successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to
LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
CLC – Evidence-Based Practice Project—Intervention Presentation on Diabetes
No of Criteria: 9 Achievement Levels: 5CriteriaAchievement
LevelsDescriptionPercentageUnsatisfactory0.00 %Less than
Satisfactory75.00 %Satisfactory79.00 %Good89.00 %Excellent100.00
%Content80.0 Article5.0The article is omitted or fails to
meet the assignment criteria.The article fails to meet most of the
assignment criteria; the article is not relevant to nursing practice.The
article is published in the last 5 years and has a general focus on an
intervention or treatment tool for managing diabetes in adults or
children. The article has some application to nursing practice.The
article is published in the last 5 years, has a focus on an intervention
or treatment tool for managing diabetes in adults or children. The
article has general application to nursing practice.The article is
published in the last 5 years, has a focus on an intervention or
treatment tool for managing diabetes in adults or children. The article
has direct application to nursing practice.Intervention or Treatment
Tool and Specific Patient Population of Study5.0Intervention, or
treatment tool, and the specific patient population used in the study
are omitted or inaccurate.An incomplete summary of the intervention, or
treatment tool, and the specific patient population used in the study is
presented. There are significant gaps and inaccuracies.A summary of the
intervention or treatment tool and the specific patient population used
in the study is presented. Some aspects require more detail for
clarity. There are minor inaccuracies.A description of the intervention
or treatment tool and the specific patient population used in the study
is presented. Minor detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.A thorough
description of the intervention or treatment tool and the specific
patient population used in the study is presented.Summary of
Article15.0The summary is omitted or fails to meet the assignment
criteria.A partial summary of the article is presented. There are major
omissions. The summary fails to accurately represent the main idea for a
specific patient population, the clinical findings, or the relevance to
diabetes and nursing practice.A summary of the article is presented.
The summary generally presents the main idea for a specific patient
population, the clinical findings, and the relevance to diabetes and
nursing practice. There are some inaccuracies. More information is
needed.A summary of the article is presented. The summary presents the
main idea for a specific patient population, the clinical findings, and
the relevance to diabetes and nursing practice. Some detail or
information is needed for clarity.A thorough summary of the article is
presented. The summary accurately presents the main idea for a specific
patient population and the clinical findings, and clearly illustrates
relevance to diabetes and nursing practice.Inclusion of the
Psychological, Cultural, and Spiritual Aspects15.0Explanation of why the
psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects are important to
consider for patient who has been diagnosed with diabetes is omitted.A
partial explanation of why the psychological, cultural, and spiritual
aspects is important to consider for a patient who has been diagnosed
with diabetes is presented. The explanation contains significant
omissions and inaccuracies. Reasoning or rationale is not provided for
support.A general explanation of why the psychological, cultural and
spiritual aspects is important to consider for a patient who has been
diagnosed with diabetes is presented. The explanation contains some
omissions and inaccuracies. General reasoning or rationale is provided
for support.An explanation of why the psychological, cultural, and
spiritual aspects is important to consider for a patient who has been
diagnosed with diabetes is presented. The explanation contains adequate
reasoning or rationale provided for support. Some detail is needed for
clarity.A compelling explanation for why the psychological, cultural and
spiritual aspects is important to consider for a patient who has been
diagnosed with diabetes is presented. The explanation is well-developed
and contains strong reasoning and rationale for support.Presentation of
Content40.0The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence
of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of
ideas is unclear.The content is vague in conveying a point of view and
does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive
information.The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas
may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their
relationships to each other.The content is written with a logical
progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity,
coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from
reliable sources.The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas
universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes
motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the
audience a clear sense of the main idea.Organization, Effectiveness, and Format20.0
Layout5.0The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use
spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text
is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point
size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of
headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.The
layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or
distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background.
Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many
different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of
appropriate indentations of text.The layout uses horizontal and vertical
white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in
a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color,
or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.The layout
background and text complement each other and enable the content to be
easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies
appropriately for headings and text.The layout is visually pleasing and
contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings,
subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the
target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the
readability of the text.Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes
sentence construction, word choice, etc.)5.0Inappropriate word choice
and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be
unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does
not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.Some
distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice
are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures
of speech appropriately.Language is appropriate to the targeted audience
for the most part.The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a
variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses
figures of speech to communicate clearly.The writer uses a variety of
sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in
distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose,
discipline, and scope.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0Slide errors are pervasive enough
that they impede communication of meaning.Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract the reader.Some mechanical errors or typos
are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.Slides
are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be
present.Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic
English.Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references,
bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)5.0Sources
are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or
incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment
and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are
documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly
correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate
to assignment and style, and format is free of error.Total Percentage 100
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”
The post Intervention Presentation on Diabetes first appeared on nursing writers.