Enforcement of International Law.
Reasoning clearly with examples, briefly explain why the UN has often failed to enforce international law despite so many motives listed. Reasoning clearly with examples, briefly explain why the ICJ (not the ICC) has often failed to enforce international law despite so many motives listed. Given the norms and ethics which govern Christian thought and practice generally, why do Christian citizens in some cases alternately embrace, tolerate, or act as bystanders in the face of US foreign policy practices (or indifference) that appear contrary to their faith tradition, practices, and principles (alliances with dictators and authoritarian rulers or non-support for or indifference to humanitarian intervention even in cases where mass murder is known to occur)? Reply Prompt: Staying focused on the themes of the prompt, offer at least two responses to (different) colleagues that critically yet respectfully engage their initial posts with affirmations, agreements, questions, alternative frameworks, different or nuanced interpretations, or additional facts that provide added perspective to the discussion. For the sake of critical focus, feel free to emphasize only one theme or aspect of their post. Remember: the goal is to be the ‘iron that sharpens iron’ (Prov. 27.17) to one another, so tailor your responses to this aim, and be likewise challenge