After reading the selections in this week’s folder, which of the primary sources (Nehru, Sukarno, Fanon, Nkrumah) tells you the most about decolonization and the end of empires? What is the writer telling you about this historical period? And why do you think it’s the most informative voice? Which source seems to be the most biased? What makes you think it is biased? What is the biased author trying to tell you about his country or time period? Can you learn anything from a biased document? Based on the last three sources (Fulbright, King, and Friedan), how do conditions in the Americas compare to the experiences in Africa and Asia? Everyone must contribute to the discussion a minimum of three times each week: one contribution will be your response to the question I have posed (300 words)
Back